Is there a way to have a 2D mesh wrapped around a 3D object. Like this:
Knot wrapped around 3D object

The red part is a flattened knot, which I mapped onto the surface of the blue part. In this specific case I used math to achieve it, but not all shapes can be easily expressed as formulae. What other ways are there?

I tried using physics, making the blue part a passive rigid body and the red part a soft body falling onto the blue part, and it seemed to work beautifully. But when I tried it again now, I realised that it doesn't do what I'm after. The net and the object onto which I want to wrap it already have the same X and Y dimensions, which is how I want it. I only need to remap the Z coordinates.

Another idea that comes to mind, would be generating a texture from the Z coordinates of the blue part and use that texture with the displace modifier on the red part. Is this possible?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ use shrink wrap modifier? $\endgroup$
    – ruckus
    Commented Nov 18, 2014 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ I honestly didn't think of that one. I tried it just now, and it doesn't do exactly what I need. And had to look again at what the physics does, and it actually fails in the same way. I didn't close enough the first time, because I couldn't find a way to get it to remain. Both curve the object, so that the vertices move along all axes, not just the Z. $\endgroup$
    – user7952
    Commented Nov 18, 2014 at 16:06

1 Answer 1


You can use a conbination of Mesh Deform and Cloth simulation with proper settings.

  • Create a grid plane to cover the whole net;
  • Add Cloth Simulator to it, then Solidify modifier;
  • Tweak settings of them;
  • Add Mesh Deform modifier to the net object. (use higher Presision value if necessary, then Band)
  • Then play or bake the final shape. Delete the grid mesh (optional).

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

Example File

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for that. Where I am, it is currently so late that it's actually early, and I'm off to bed. I will try this out when I wake up. $\endgroup$
    – user7952
    Commented Nov 19, 2014 at 4:38
  • $\begingroup$ I upvoted and accepted your answer. It does change the X and Y coordinates as the net wraps around the collider, but it certainly feels like it gives me more control than the shrinkwrap, suggested in a comment to my question, especially in the case where I bevel the net before wrapping it. Thanks a lot for your effort. $\endgroup$
    – user7952
    Commented Nov 19, 2014 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Sure. You can also do manual control instead of simulation (In that case, a Lattice modifier works better). I believe both leave you a lot of flexablility. :) $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2014 at 2:18

You must log in to answer this question.