Timeline for Do motion blur shutter curves work correctly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2017 at 14:25 | answer | added | HenrikD | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 17:57 | comment | added | tClancey | I think the idea is you can create just what you want, or at least near to it... adaptivesamples.com/2015/11/16/cycles-custom-motion-blur-curves | |
| Oct 29, 2016 at 2:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBlender/status/792195681633067008 | ||
| Oct 28, 2016 at 20:00 | comment | added | A. Tropics | In that case: What is the shutter curve actually used for? I was thinking it would allow you to set a somewhat focus on one frame while blending others a bit in. I am looking for something like this: vvvv.org/sites/default/files/imagecache/large/… | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 1:26 | comment | added | Gez | You have to adjust your expectations :-) Check any photo or movie still with motion blur, and you'll find that it looks exactly as the image you showed, with only one exception: when the camera is tracking the object. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 17:25 | comment | added | Jake Dube | Yeah, I think that's the way they always are...I've never seen it any differently. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 4:28 | history | edited | A. Tropics | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified expectation
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 4:17 | history | asked | A. Tropics | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
