Timeline for Stacking cycles renders in the compositor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 at 7:55 | answer | added | Greg Zaal | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 7:27 | comment | added | Greg Zaal | I wouldn't say it's pointless in CG - if you want a larger focal area but still a lot of DoF, you can use it. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 23:20 | comment | added | gandalf3 | @Matt ah, now I get it :) I edited your question and removed the mention of focus stacking to avoid confusing anyone. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 23:19 | history | edited | gandalf3 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed title to reflect question
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 22:01 | comment | added | Matt | Yes, that's what I meant by saying it was "easier" ;-) It was a bad joke. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 19:09 | comment | added | gandalf3 | @Matt AFAIK focus stacking is only used in photography, to use it in cycles (or any CG application) is pointless when you can just disable DOF. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 15:59 | comment | added | Matt | I guess focus stacking is a lot easier to do ;-) Just don't use any DoF... | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 15:42 | vote | accept | Matt | ||
| Nov 21, 2013 at 8:46 | comment | added | Greg Zaal | Focus Stacking refers to a different thing entirely - stacking multiple images with a shallow DoF in order to create a more deep DoF in a particular area. This is not the same as Image Stacking to combine noisy images in Cycles. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 1:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBlender/status/403327732492161024 | ||
| Nov 20, 2013 at 20:57 | answer | added | gandalf3 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 20:51 | history | asked | Matt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |