Timeline for principled volume does not accept my black color
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2022 at 13:21 | vote | accept | Chris | ||
| Aug 1, 2022 at 13:21 | answer | added | Gordon Brinkmann | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 13:16 | comment | added | Chris | if you want, write an answer, i will accept it and thanks for that idea!!! | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:57 | comment | added | Chris | i just got the idea by your comment ;) | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:56 | comment | added | Gordon Brinkmann | Just my thought exactly ;) | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:56 | comment | added | Chris | @GordonBrinkmann: but thanks for your suggestion, i got an idea: i try to increase density just for black parts | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:56 | comment | added | Gordon Brinkmann | Well, black doesn't reflect as much light as white, so the problem is the black seems to disappear inbetween the bright smoke. What you would need is thick black smoke and thin white smoke combined. So maybe you can get a better example when (instead of using a general density setting of 2) you use inverted black and white values as multiplier. But without the exact same smoke simulation I can hardly give you any advice how to achieve the best result. | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:52 | comment | added | Chris | you are right, with higher density the black color appears but then my smoke looks really bad :( | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 12:51 | comment | added | Gordon Brinkmann | What have you tried so far? When I'm looking at both images, the smoke seems to be very thin if it's still very transparent at a density of 2. Is the black color still invisible if you set it to 50? 100? | |
| Aug 1, 2022 at 11:10 | history | asked | Chris | CC BY-SA 4.0 |