Return to Answer

The original dataset was taken from the Computer Vision Labratory, and more specifically this portion of the site. The research PDF is available here.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding as the results are normalized. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters sadly.

The original dataset was taken from the Computer Vision Laboratory, and more specifically this portion of the site. The research PDF is available here.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding as the results are normalized. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters sadly.

The original dataset was taken from the Computer Vision Labratory. The research PDF is available here.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters sadly.

The original dataset was taken from the Computer Vision Labratory, and more specifically this portion of the site. The research PDF is available here.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding as the results are normalized. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters sadly.

I never can seem to find the datasets when I hunt for them. I recall them being taken from a French based site originally.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters.

The original dataset was taken from the Computer Vision Labratory. The research PDF is available here.

The response data didn't include the primary colours, nor the log encoding. They are essentially junk Instagram-esque filters sadly.