Timeline for Is there a way to render single frame using network rendering in Cycles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017 at 16:29 | comment | added | Justin | There's a small downside to this method. There will be more noise in a stacked image than an image that was rendered in one go. This answer explains why: blender.stackexchange.com/a/7342/1170 | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 17:30 | comment | added | Greg Zaal | In the sampling panel is the seed value: i.imgur.com/u5Duqtc.jpg | |
| Nov 6, 2013 at 14:09 | comment | added | Justin | Awesome. How would I go about changing the seed? | |
| Jun 10, 2013 at 1:44 | comment | added | ideasman42 | if you use stacking you may want to blend at higher bit depth then 8 bits per color channel. (using formats such as EXR/PNG/TIFF that support higher color depths) | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 19:13 | comment | added | jesterKing | This is indeed the process we use at renderfarm.fi. | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 14:46 | comment | added | Greg Zaal | You can use ImageMagick (imagemagick.org/script/binary-releases.php) to automate it really quickly. A single command in the terminal/command prompt will merge all the images inside a folder: convert *.jpg -evaluate-sequence mean OUT.jpg | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 9:38 | comment | added | Marcin Skrzypczak | Wow Greg, I think you just saved the day! I can distribute my frame through network rendering as a short animation without any movement, that will give me series of images to stacking. Now, I only need to automate image stacking itself. | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 20:20 | history | answered | Greg Zaal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
