Timeline for Can frames with no animation be automatically skipped?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2020 at 11:10 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 96 characters in body
|
| Feb 25, 2019 at 8:45 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix ios -> osx
|
| Feb 25, 2019 at 3:15 | comment | added | SilverWolf | The answer mentions "iOS". Do you mean OS X / macOS? | |
| May 4, 2015 at 18:20 | comment | added | Mutant Bob | The tactic I suggested would allow you to save some disk space and avoid spawning a subprocess, although the extra code to create VSE strips is somewhat burdensome. For a scene where there was motion from 1-100, still from 101-150 and motion from 151-200 you would create 1 strip with frames 1-100, then a still image spanning 101-150, and another strip for frames 151-200. You would still have to perform the logic that figures out where the stills are. | |
| May 4, 2015 at 13:26 | comment | added | Ulf Aslak | @MutantBob That sounds like it beats the purpose of outputting the exact same files as a normal render would, or am I missing your point? | |
| May 4, 2015 at 13:26 | comment | added | Ulf Aslak | @poor I'll get to it once I can. | |
| May 4, 2015 at 13:16 | comment | added | Mutant Bob | Rather than copy the frames, another possibility would be to use the VSE and create strips for the bits with motion and stills for the bits without motion. Another option would be a speed control strip effect strip to stretch out the still parts. | |
| May 4, 2015 at 9:19 | comment | added | p2or | Can you provide a test scene as starting point? I'll try test it and implement shutil in the next days. | |
| May 4, 2015 at 9:04 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added note to make users aware that code i not windows compatible.
|
| May 4, 2015 at 8:57 | comment | added | Ulf Aslak | Oh shoot, I did not think about this AT ALL. You are very welcome to edit the post in order to make the code os independent. | |
| May 4, 2015 at 6:41 | comment | added | p2or |
First thanks for sharing this. Maybe it's a good idea to mention that this is linux only, because of subprocess.call(["cp" .. ]). Might be better to replace this with shutil module to be os independent like in the linked script above.
|
|
| May 3, 2015 at 20:43 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed some text to boldfont to emphasise its importance
|
| Apr 27, 2015 at 1:38 | vote | accept | gandalf3 | ||
| Apr 26, 2015 at 15:56 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 15:29 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited the edit
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 15:19 | history | edited | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved script by considering each objects f curve data at each frame rather than just looking at differences in keyframes
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 14:30 | comment | added | p2or | related: blender.stackexchange.com/questions/1718/… | |
| Apr 26, 2015 at 0:05 | history | answered | Ulf Aslak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |