Timeline for Is there a workaround for missing snapping in shrink/fatten? (curve bevel/taper? But I do not get it)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2022 at 18:41 | comment | added | CoD | @GordonBrinkmann must have been some hickup or i forget something. I now reimported the stuff (to have a more refined mesh as basis) and am now not able to recreate this issue. Maybe i just forgot to apply some transform (am quite sure i did not tho). If i will run into this again i will upload an example here and tag you. | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 18:21 | comment | added | Gordon Brinkmann | @CoD This sounds a little strange when all transforms were applied... The problem is, my solution is built with my own models, whatever there might be in yours going wrong is not recreated this way. Maybe you could upload your file so I can investigate it further? Maybe there is a certain reason it's not working as expected. What I don't understand in your picture with the result, why is the bottom such a pinpoint, where is the original rounded rectangular shape? For the scaling issues: very often this is caused by the different scaling and number formats in different softwares. | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 18:12 | comment | added | Gordon Brinkmann | @Nathan Nevermind :) | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 17:35 | comment | added | Nathan | Pardon, I missed that! | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 17:19 | vote | accept | CoD | ||
| Apr 7, 2022 at 17:19 | comment | added | CoD | @GordonBrinkmann I need to scale the profile down by 0.001 to get the right result ... not sure why. (Does it have to do with unit scale beeing 0.001 and mm? But why do i not need to scale down the curve also then ... i am confused). Well, at least now i know how to do it, thx. | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 17:13 | comment | added | CoD | @Gordon Brinkmann This is a very good explanation (the clue with the origin is especially helpful) and it should work... but somehow i get this as a result: de.catbox.moe/p3tol0.png ... at the base it has the right size but at the top it is much much much to wide and overall it is much much much too high. (All transforms were applied before) | |
| Apr 7, 2022 at 16:51 | history | edited | Gordon Brinkmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2022 at 16:31 | history | answered | Gordon Brinkmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
