Timeline for How to create a Tetrix/Sierpinski Tetrahedron fractal radiating from 0,0,0 ? Python or nodes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2019 at 12:59 | comment | added | t8ja | LOL I got confused... the gif I now added shows the simpler version (previously, DELETED, described here, done manually and in an easier more logical way) , but the original description would have each tetra experience the initial fragmentation and that appears much more difficult to animate. | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 12:53 | comment | added | t8ja | So far I've identified the "manipulator elements" I need to get the desired result. For the first case"multiplication case", the sequence goes as follows: first there is one, one multiplies to 4, the 4 go in the directions determined by the vertices (Ctrl+Alt+Space to get a custom orientation from the 4 vertices). | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 12:28 | comment | added | miceterminator | I don't follow. There are many ways to animate the creation of a Tetrix and I am unable to deduce the way you want to do it from your question. The alignment is somewhat flexible as you can change that by rotating the original vertex coordinates defined in the "vec" variable. | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 12:15 | comment | added | t8ja | Very nice results, but can you tell me do they relate to the methods I was describing, since my idea was to do the multiplication and repositioning in a way such that every step is animatable ? Are the original single tetra in your scripts oriented in the way I described in the end ? I'd like to confirm my hunch, that this approach would slim down the script. | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 10:24 | comment | added | miceterminator | Speed counts for nothing without readability. My code runs a bit faster, but it is not really well documented. I spend too much time trying to get a cool animation to go with the answer :). | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 10:13 | comment | added | TLousky | You're too kind @miceterminator (though maybe not to mice? :-D). Great job reconstructing that Mathematica code in an elegant, efficient way. I suspect your code might run faster, it took me 120 seconds on my 13" Macbook pro to generate a 10 step tetrix. Did you run any benchmarks? | |
| Jun 20, 2019 at 10:07 | history | edited | miceterminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2019 at 10:00 | history | edited | miceterminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2019 at 9:00 | history | edited | miceterminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Jun 20, 2019 at 8:43 | history | answered | miceterminator | CC BY-SA 4.0 |