Since the Denoise feature was added to Blender I only use the default setting with it and it really does the work. But sometimes the denoise is noticable on some of my renders. How can I overcome the blurred effect? Denoising for me is a big help because my system is quite aged.


4 Answers 4


Denoising is a great tool, but it is not a miracle button that works equally for each and every cause of render noise. It seems to work better in areas where the surfaces don't have a lot of detail, and the brightness values and colors are more homogeneous.

High contrast areas or with lots of variation in their values might not fare so well after denoise.

In this example the denoiser is creating a splotchy or smeared image:

enter image description here

The same with fireflies, where the bright spots have very different than their surrounding pixels.

Read: https://developer.blender.org/T52802

There are many causes for noise in rendering, each scene is different, and what worked in some circumstances might not work in others.

But the key thing to be aware of is that denoising will introduce new artifacts, and is certainly not a substitute for a decent number of samples.

Depending on the kind of noise you are dealing with you might get decent results with it along with other tricks, and in some cases not using denoise at all.

Some examples:

64 samples. Horribly noisy and full of fireflies, as expected:

enter image description here (Click on any of the images to show full screen)

Compare to 64 Samples with denoiser's default settings:

enter image description here

Most of the noise and fireflies and are gone, but the the noise has been replaced with areas that look blotchy or smeared. New Black artifacts have appeared around the thin and bright areas of the image.

At 500 samples

Image with no denoising:

enter image description here

Compare to 500 samples with default setting for the denoiser. Most of the smearing is gone, but the black artifacts on the bright areas remain.

enter image description here

Increasing the radius makes the problem worse (at the maximum strength of 25 pixels the artifacts in the thin bright areas is worsened).

enter image description here

A smaller radius helps with the black dots around the thin bright areas, but the blotchy areas re-appear to some extent.

enter image description here

Combining denoiser with low values for all of the settings along with some clamping (direct and indirect):

enter image description here

1,000 samples with no denoiser, some clamp direct and clamp indirect:

enter image description here

A lot less noise on and the fireflies are lessened, but the brightness of the scene's highlights has suffered.

Lastly, just for fun, a very clear render at 100,000 samples, no denoiser or other magic settings:

enter image description here

Very low noise, no fireflies and no artifacts... but many hours to render.

As you can see, the denoiser works wonderfully for some situations and not at all in others, having more samples makes some the artifacts introduced less apparent (smear) but does not solve all of the issues with high contrast...

Hopefully this will help you make more informed decisions when to use it or what to expect.

Another example:

100 samples, Fireflies without denoiser.

enter image description here

100 samples: Fireflies with denoiser:

enter image description here

No denoiser, more samples and clamp indirect:

enter image description here

Please read through the following related links and explore the many solutions for noise, maybe one of them will work for your project.

How to avoid noisy renders in Cycles?

Problems with denoising in rendering How to reduce fireflies in Cycles?

What is branched path tracing and how is it useful?

Branched Path Tracing

What does "number of diffuse/glossy/... bounce samples" mean?

How do I use the cycles Denoiser?

  • $\begingroup$ Also related: blender.stackexchange.com/questions/96101/… $\endgroup$
    – user1853
    Jan 14, 2018 at 19:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wonder if the Eevee engine in 2.8 will be useful for filling in areas that the denoiser performs badly in? $\endgroup$
    – 3pointedit
    Apr 19, 2018 at 0:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @3pointedit You could probably already achieve that using cycles render passes. Most of the passes have little to no noise. Some clever denoising and masking of certain passes that are prone to noise would probably yield better/equal results. $\endgroup$ Jul 19, 2018 at 7:06

When relying heavily on the denoiser this blurred effect is inevitable, but turning the samples up a little bit from what you were previously using could help. See this 1 sample image: enter image description here vs this 6 sample image: enter image description here There is a huge difference for only adding 6 samples. What I'm saying is, even if you only added say 50 samples to the final image it could make a big difference to the clarity of the final result... It's probably worth the extra time.


On a similar question, cegaton advised that I place my response here.

I simply stated that I prefer the denoise settings turned down a bit, to minimize it's blur effect; because yes it's useful, but it's best not to overdo it.

denoise settings


Denoising in the Compositor - Blender 2.81+

Enable Denoising Data from View Layer Properties -> Passes -> Data.

enter image description here

Switch to the Compositing Workspace, enable nodes, and add a Denoise node. Connect the Denoising Normal and Denoising Albedo.

enter image description here

There is some debate about whether Image or Noisy Image gives a better result.


From this:

enter image description here

To this:

enter image description here


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.