I was confused when I added portals to my scene, and it actually increased (slowed down) the render quite considerably!

Here is the demo scene I used to confirm this: portal-demo.zip

  • portals disabled: 0:47
  • portals enabled: 1:36

Additional edits after original post

In the scene I'm working on, I created two renders to compare portal lamps enabled/disabled — the sample amount is adjusted to achieve the same render time — and I find that the scene with portals enabled looks considerably worse!

This indicates to me, that in my scene, the portals cause the render to slow down, and ultimately produces a worse result.

Could this be, because my room has two rather large windows, and with a certain amount of "openness" to your indoor scene, perhaps the benefits of portals are outweighed by the costs?

(my previous little suzanne portal-demo.zip room seems more reasonable, perhaps because it has a much smaller window?)

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've found that when portals are enabled, the render is slower — however there is considerably less sampling noise.. to achieve the same level of noise with portals disabled, one must increase the sampling so much that the render time overtakes the portals-enabled scene — that is, portals slow down your render, but manages to "wring" out more bang for your buck for the same number of samples, and is thus worthwhile — TLDR portals let you lower the number of samples and achieve a faster render that way $\endgroup$ Dec 7, 2017 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ While my above comment appears to be true for the portal-demo.zip scene I provided, it appears to me that there is a limitation on the usefulness of portals — they seem to have diminishing returns when the "openness" of your interior scene reaches a certain threshold — that is, in my scene with very large windows, portals appear to actually slow down the render and degrade the quality of the image (adding more apparent noise) $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2017 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but all of the above has been stated before and is partially included in the manual. Use portals sparingly and only when the window is rather small. $\endgroup$
    – Leander
    Dec 8, 2017 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Leander — thanks for including a link to the relevant area in the manual. It says portals aren't good for "outdoor" scenes, but that's fairly vague and I consider my scene rather indoors — for those who may be curious, my scene where portals are detracting from quality is a roughly cube-shaped roomm where one whole wall is simply open to the outdoors, and there is also an open doorway in an adjacent wall — this amount of "openness" seems to be about the crux point where portals are no longer worthwhile $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2017 at 0:23

1 Answer 1


Portals have limitations — it depends on how "open" your scene is

As mentioned by @Leander, the blender manual says that portals are not good for "outdoor" scenes.

  • portals lamps provide diminishing returns as your indoor scene becomes too "open"
  • in other words, if your indoor scene has several very large windows, you may be better off without using the portals (because the cost of portals starts to outweigh the benefits)
  • in my experience, I found portals to be unfit (by a narrow margin) for an indoor scene where I have a room with a whole wall basically missing (huge floor-to-ceiling window), and also an open doorway in one of the intact walls (think of a garage with the big door open, and also a side-door open too)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .