5
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to make it so that the plane is transparent except for the light from the aqua emission. Or in other words, how can I make it so that the plane's white areas are transparent and the plane's aqua areas are not? I want to achieve this without using the compositor, only with material nodes.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You want it for a still render or animation? $\endgroup$ – Paul Gonet Jul 29 '17 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ @PaulGonet Animation $\endgroup$ – Squirrel Jul 29 '17 at 18:43
  • $\begingroup$ For still you can bake the emission and use it as a mask and for animation I'm affraid it is doable only by using compositor. $\endgroup$ – Paul Gonet Jul 29 '17 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ Is your goal to have the reflections be a light beam effect? You might be better off using volumes instead. $\endgroup$ – TARDIS Maker Jan 9 at 7:05
7
$\begingroup$

As far as I know this is fundamentally impossible to achieve in Cycles

Cycles being a physically based renderer has to find a solution to the rendering equation this includes calculating all lighting interactions influenced by surface properties. Materials can't possibly depend on the render results; so surfaces properties can't be influenced by the render solution.

As such transparency can never be the result of light intensity which would cause a dependency loop in rendering process. You can't determine surface lighting before you know its transparency, and you can't set its transparency without knowing the light intensity.

So either fake it in the compositor, bake the light into a texture, render in separate layers and separate steps, use a Shadow Catcher material (only available in 2.79+ versions), or change render engines and use something non physically based, or non photorealistic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Alright, thanks for the answer! I'll find some alternate way, I'm sure. $\endgroup$ – Squirrel Jul 30 '17 at 0:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Very clear explanation. I have the same thoughts (explained it in my comment). +1 from me. @Squirrel You won't find an alternate way unless you use the Compositor ;P. $\endgroup$ – Paul Gonet Jul 30 '17 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ @PaulGonet Actually I meant find some alternate way to use emissions like not use emissions on the ship or something like that (model-based) $\endgroup$ – Squirrel Jul 30 '17 at 17:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.