Here is a quick comparison test in both Blender and Cycles. Mesh is default cube with one deleted vertex and Point lamp in the center.

Generally speaking, smooth or flat shading regardless of subsurf level doesn't affect Cycles so much in this case. Maybe a bit brighter or darker for different combination, but equal overall. Light is concentrated more in the center of polygons.

But in Blender Render only unsubdivided smooth mesh can be a little closer to Cycles, other combinations are totally different. Moreover, higly subdivided smooth mesh looks pretty much the same as unsubdivided flat.

Are there any animation-friendly ways to transform light distribution for Blender Render?

Blender Smooth Unsubdivided enter image description here

Cycles Smooth Unsubdivided enter image description here

Blender Smooth Subdivided enter image description here

Cycles Smooth Subdivided enter image description here

Blender Flat enter image description here

Cycles Flat enter image description here


1 Answer 1


Smooth shading is an attempt to programmatically and dynamically make triangular meshes "look" rounded (smoothed). Even though the reflection looks smooth, the geometry remains unchanged: enter image description here

With a perfect cube, there should technically be nothing to smooth; but you applied the shader, so it's gonna try to do something. The problem that you're seeing in the first two pictures is that those faces are not technically four-sided... at least in the graphical/mathematical sense. Four-or-more-sided polygons are only for the human eye and mind, not the graphics engine. Those three faces are actually made up of six triangles. When the smooth shader is applied to them, it's attempting to "smooth" all the edges and faces and that's why it looks like triangles (the Cycles version is less pronounced but if you rotate it, you'll see it).

enter image description here

When you subdivide it, though, you're adding a lot more geometry to the mesh (especially at level 6, that's 6 orders of magnitude more triangles). So the shader has more geometry to draw from in order to "approximate" the look you're going for.

The same effect can be achieved by using the Edge Split modifier which adds weights to the edges (essentially doubling the edges, it adds more geometry to the mesh) at specified angles of incidence. In this case, the edges at 90 degrees could be given the weights but the diagonal in the middle of the faces would be outside the threshold of the edge split.

enter image description here

As for the differences between BR and Cycles rendering, they're two totally different engines and they both have their own ideal uses. But there's a lot out there on that subject.

EDIT: I should add, for plenitude, that the Edge Split modifier effect can be obtained without increasing filesize. It's called "auto-smooth" and it's located under Properties Pane-> Object Data-> Normals.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .