8
$\begingroup$

As we now have volumetrics in cycles, it's possible to render procedural textures in 3D.

For example, you can render a cube:

enter image description here

Like this:

enter image description here


However, is it possible to generate an actual mesh based on the intensity of a procedural texture?

I tried to do something like this:

  1. Simulate particle system being affected by procedural texture
  2. Convert particle system to vertices
  3. Mesh using the convex hull modifier

But I failed because:

  • I couldn't get the particles to group convincingly based on the intensity of a texture
  • The result was concave, so the convex hull operator was not useful.

How can I generate a mesh in this way?

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Particle is a nice idea to do this, and it is possible to control the volumetric density by procedual texture:

enter image description here

Demo file


Edit:

As MarcClinton mentioned in comment, a nice addon called MSMesher can be a relatively nice solution:

enter image description here

The result looks similar to metaballs, which means, to generate a sharper shape, further remeshing would be considered.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Now I just need some way to mesh them.. metaballs? $\endgroup$ – gandalf3 Jan 22 '14 at 7:28
  • $\begingroup$ Metaball is fine, just sort of overkill. $\endgroup$ – Leon Cheung Jan 22 '14 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ The MSMesher Addon might do this for you. Here is a thread on BA.org blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?284678-MSMesher The authors username is MohamedSakr and there is a video link for Vimeo titled MSMesher Introduction $\endgroup$ – MarcClintDion Feb 4 '14 at 23:29
  • $\begingroup$ @MarcClintDion Ah, I think this is what the OP want. MSMesher seems nice here, although it seems hard to make a sharp-enough result. But we can try using Remesh after that. I think it's less overkill than metaball. $\endgroup$ – Leon Cheung Feb 5 '14 at 4:36
  • $\begingroup$ Well, since you bring it up. I do remember seeing all quads and they appeared evenly spaced and are well oriented along all three axis. It looks ideal for Loop Cuts(Ctrl-R). The one big thing I noticed is that all traffic on this thread stopped several months ago. Maybe someone else will have to take up the maintenance. $\endgroup$ – MarcClintDion Feb 5 '14 at 6:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.