3
$\begingroup$

Is there a script which can correct all compatibility breaks, (automatically looks what version of Blender the file was made with and adds whatever necessary to get it look like before)?

Example: Let's say normal map strength is now 10 times smaller. For files created prior to 2.67, just multiply the value with 10 after opening in a 2.67+ version, to get the effect the artist really created.

If not, is there a text file listing all those compatibility breaks so that we can understand why, when a file looks weird/wrong?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The 'compadibility' tag got approved twice.. I will retag with the correct spelling when the system deletes the old one. $\endgroup$
    – iKlsR
    Jun 6, 2013 at 21:28

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

No, not as far as I know of.

Blender can load older files into newer Blender version, taking care of updating settings.

It's possible to write a script that changes the settings of a .blend file of course, but this would most likely be a workaround for problems in Blender's own conversion, so if there is really a bug there, it should be reported.

In other cases changes cant be easily converted since the settings are not 1:1 equivalent, so in those cases you probably have to accept some manual tweaking to get comparable settings.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. Ton himself asked for the file (emirage.org/2013/04/24/…) to be in the official blender site, it would be a shame if an official file is not correctly supported. But how can I know if it's a bug or an impossible conversion ? My math knowledge is not that good, I thought everything has it's inverse, but if it's not the case. Should I take the risk of reporting something that is not a bug or can you compare the file in 2.66 and 2.67b and say if it can get corrected automatically ? $\endgroup$
    – matali
    Jun 6, 2013 at 6:31
  • $\begingroup$ If your not sure, report a bug, then the maintainer of that area can see if this can be better converted. $\endgroup$
    – ideasman42
    Jun 6, 2013 at 6:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.