I have a panoramic image which I would like to set as a spherical background for my scene, which is using Cycles Render.

As the camera changes orientation, the background should stay fixed (like a skymap) and not move with the camera.

Any ideas?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By "move appropriately," do you mean that the image should follow the camera, or do you just mean that the image should act like you expect a skymap to? $\endgroup$
    – Matt
    Commented Dec 19, 2013 at 17:42

1 Answer 1


If your image is an equirectangular projection, you can use the Environment texture node within the World space node editor (see red markup), with Equirectangular projection type (second setting) :

enter image description here

The yellowed area in this image correspond to optional nodes you can add to control the position of the background if you have already set the objects and camera's position, and don't want to move them again.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Just want to add that this supports both Equirectangular and Mirror Ball projections. For examples of each (and a ton of great skymaps for free) see here. $\endgroup$
    – wchargin
    Commented Dec 19, 2013 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Polosson! But perhaps you could clarify something in your post. Following your method with Equirectangular projection, the image is mapped to the entire sphere, unlike in Blender Internal, where it seems to be mapped to the upper hemisphere. The rectangular images in the site suggested by @WChargin are meant to be mapped to the upper hemisphere. To get around this, I opened them in Gimp and doubled the height of the image by adding alpha below it. Is that the best way? $\endgroup$
    – Garrett
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 8:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ AFAIK, real equirectangular maps are supposed to be 360° x 180°, so they cover the entire sphere, from top to bottom. If your map is a half-sphere (360°x90°), you'll have to edit it, indeed, to add height. I can't found a best way for now, sorry! $\endgroup$
    – Polosson
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 11:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That probably is the best way as long as you have a ground plane that extends into the horizon. Realistically, if I look down, I expect to see the ground, not more of the sky, unless there's a giant hole bored through the center of the earth and I happen to be standing above it. (In which case yes, you would need a full sphere sky texture.) $\endgroup$
    – wchargin
    Commented Dec 20, 2013 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ Cool, thanks. I agree it seems to make sense for the equirectangular map to map the whole sphere. I guess it's the behavior in Blender Internal that's a bit more strange. $\endgroup$
    – Garrett
    Commented Dec 21, 2013 at 0:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .