2
$\begingroup$

I'm doing a character mesh for animation, simulation, and posing/3d printing, and was trying to figure out the best way to do clothing. Should I model it as part of the character, and worry about making it behave properly in rigging? Or do I model it separately and fit it to the character? It seems like the best way to do it would be to model it on top of the character, and apply a cloth simulator, but I'm not sure if there might be a better way of doing it.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

All the ways are valid, but there are advantages/disadvantages to all of them and so it depends which is the best one:

Simulating the cloth on a rigged character:

  • Blender cloth physics are slow (single-threaded) and do not offer the best settings, so it's best to do the simulations in some other software (Qualoth, Marvelous Designer, etc.) and bring them back into Blender as .mdd files. In Blender there is also a way to transfer a low-resolution simulation to a higher-resolution mesh to save some time: Ways to have one mesh control another?

  • Such simulation results in accurate wrinkles, accurate cloth fit and deformations. The fabric slides over the character etc. When the animation is fast, there can be artifacts - so the animation has to be sometimes composed with multiple of simulations and some cleanup work. It is time demanding.

  • The animator has usually poor preview of how the clothing behaves, and he must wait for it ()

Modeling the cloth separately and rigging it:

  • The cloth can be relatively fast sculpted, and rigged with extra set of bones so the cloth can slide over the character. The animator has full control over the cloth bones (some can be rigged with constrains), which is both advantage and disadvantage, as he has more work with it. The more bones the cloth has, the better deformations can be achieved, but small wrinkles and a look of a simulation is very hard to do even with blend-shapes.

Separately rigged cloth with parts simulated (both upper methods combined).

  • Probably the best option to leave some artistic control and have the fidelity of simulation. Also most game engines are only simulating parts of clothing.

Rigging the cloth with the character armature:

  • The worst deformations, as the cloth cannot slide much over the character. There can be some basic wrinkling with corrective shape-keys (and sliding), so the animation doesn't look like a character completely made out of play dough.

  • This is fastest to setup, but usually usable only on background characters. Also good for fast iterative approach to setup the final animation and then refine the cloth and deformations with shape-keys exactly for that animation and camera angle.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.