I have a character/creature I am attempting to model whose anatomy is quite obscure and disproportionate. Very long tentacle-like structures protruding from a mushroom-like torso just to name a few characteristics. My initial idea was to start with a base mesh object like a cylinder and just transform/scale/rotate/subdivide that cylinder until voilà: my creature has been modeled.

Now, I'm thinking I will need to tackle each limb/tentacle/section separately and build the entire creature out of many base mesh objects. Perhaps, a cylinder for the torso, some cones for the tentacles, etc. However, this approach will leave me with a bunch of disconnected body parts that I will somehow need to "fuse" together.

What approach is most efficient? If neither of my approaches sound like the right thing to do, I would greatly appreciate a detailed explanation of an alternative approach. Examples would be nice too.

For now, I'm going with creating and/or duplicating objects and linking/unlinking them as necessary.


1 Answer 1


I suggest using sculpting with dynamic topology. It is perfect for extruding tentacles, ears and horns.

Dynamic sculpting

Also available are extrusion in edit mode. Select a quad and hit e. Drag out a bit, move and rotate and continue extruding to form your limb. Apply subdivision to get a smooth surface (2 or 3 steps maybe).

extruded limb

With subdivision modifier:

extruded subdivided limb

  • $\begingroup$ So, are you suggesting that I always start with a single base mesh (sphere, cylinder, cube, etc.) and extrude/sculpt from there my entire character/creature? Is there ever a reason to sculpt individual parts of an anatomy as separate objects? $\endgroup$ Oct 31, 2013 at 16:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Stick with one mesh until you get trouble with performance. Try to split at logical seams. If you want reasonable detail level, you will need to split. Where a hand comes out of a jacket or a leg goes Into a boot are examples of good seams. $\endgroup$
    – Gunslinger
    Oct 31, 2013 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks again! One last question: what are some typical causes of trouble with performance? Too much geometry? $\endgroup$ Oct 31, 2013 at 19:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, sooner or later you will get to much geometry (of course depending on your hardware also). You can have blender to draw your mesh at a lower resolution when navigating the view. You find this in the toolbar (toggle with <kbd>t</kbd>) under "Options". Check the "Fast navigate" checkbox. $\endgroup$
    – Gunslinger
    Oct 31, 2013 at 20:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.