22
$\begingroup$

Where is Transfer attribute node in 3.4? I don't find it in the list of nodes:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

42
$\begingroup$

The Transfer Attribute has been replaced by the set of nodes.

Transfer Attribute in Nearest Surface Point mode is now Sample Nearest Surface:

enter image description here

Transfer Attribute in Index mode is now Sample Index and is used in combination with the Index node:

enter image description here

Transfer Attribute in Nearest mode is now Sample Nearest and is used in combination with the Sample Index node:

enter image description here

By the way, you can check the updates related to Geometry Nodes here:
Can't find the node! Which node is available in which Blender version?

...or the more detailed version with corresponding links to the documentation of the individual nodes:
https://geometry-nodes-overview.docs.quellenform.at/
(This list is constantly updating)

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Great contribution! I have also linked this in the Geometry Nodes Overview $\endgroup$
    – quellenform
    Oct 4, 2022 at 18:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ acting in advance $\endgroup$
    – Crantisz
    Oct 4, 2022 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ I haven't used 3.4 geonodes yet, but until now you didn't have to connect index to index, as that was done implicitly (just like you don't have to connect UV map to an image texture in shader). You already take advantage of that by not connecting anything to the "Sample Position" (the position node is implied, probably) $\endgroup$ Oct 4, 2022 at 23:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have some issues working with this feature, I saw lot of tutorials which shows how to transform from one object into another using transfer attribute and I am not able to reproduce with the new kind of nodes. I just want to morph a cube into a cylinder. I only achieved so far a transformation from cube to a line. $\endgroup$
    – MaKaNu
    Feb 22, 2023 at 21:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don´t understand why the transfer attribute node has been replaced by this seemingly more complicated set up of nodes. Can someone enlighten me? Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Victor
    Feb 24, 2023 at 14:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .