Trying this very basic simple straight forward script, invoked by console command

$ blender --python basic_script.py

#! basic_script.py

# add a primitive cylinder
# toggle into edit
# resize, works perfect
bpy.ops.transform.resize(value=(0.01, 0.01, 5))
# move, works perfect
bpy.ops.transform.translate(value=(0, 0, 5))
# rotate, poll()wrong context, What!??
bpy.ops.transform.rotate(value=1.5708, orient_axis='X', orient_type='GLOBAL')

100 possible answers, none of em worked

  • $\begingroup$ When rotating in the program itself, blender calls bpy.ops.transform.rotate(value=1.5708, orient_axis='X', orient_type='GLOBAL', orient_matrix=((1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1)), orient_matrix_type='GLOBAL', constraint_axis=(True, False, False), mirror=True, use_proportional_edit=False, proportional_edit_falloff='SMOOTH', proportional_size=1, use_proportional_connected=False, use_proportional_projected=False) - not sure how much of that you truly need - perhaps just the matrix transform. I think if you leave it out, you need to set the rotation in radians which requires you to import math.. $\endgroup$ Aug 29, 2021 at 21:47
  • $\begingroup$ I tried with full list of attributes, no luck either $\endgroup$
    – hewi
    Aug 29, 2021 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristopherBennett, it all works from the scripting tab. I think OP needs to specify a context or set one active before the rotation command. $\endgroup$
    – Ron Jensen
    Aug 29, 2021 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ and I cannot figure out how to set the correct context $\endgroup$
    – hewi
    Aug 29, 2021 at 22:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No idea why there is a poll error. Instead would prompt for matrices based solution as answered by Ron. Somewhat related blender.stackexchange.com/questions/214655/… blender.stackexchange.com/a/214497/15543 $\endgroup$
    – batFINGER
    Aug 30, 2021 at 13:08

1 Answer 1


I converted your script over to use bmesh constructs. Note that matrix multiplication is not commutative, so $A \cdot B$ is not always equal to $B \cdot A$, and Python for some reason decided to use '@' as matrix multiply.

#! basic_script.py
import bpy
import bmesh # https://docs.blender.org/api/current/bmesh.ops.html
import mathutils # https://docs.blender.org/api/current/mathutils.html

# lets be sure we're in object mode

# add a primitive cylinder
# our new object should be the active object, so grab a handle to it

# Make a new BMesh
bm = bmesh.new()
bm.from_mesh(me)   # fill it in from a Mesh

# build the transform matrix, order matters
mat = mathutils.Matrix.Diagonal( ( 0.01, 0.01, 5 ) ).to_4x4()
mat = mathutils.Matrix.Translation((0, 0, 5)) @ mat
mat = mathutils.Matrix.Rotation(1.5708, 4, 'X') @ mat

# for v in bm.verts:
#     v.co = mat @ v.co
# Apply the transform matrix

  • $\begingroup$ There you are.... ;) Thank you for helping this user. I'm over here watching some truly awful tutorials, trying to figure it out. $\endgroup$ Aug 29, 2021 at 23:39
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ There aren't any good Python programming tutorials for Blender that I've found. The API is too much of a shifting target. $\endgroup$
    – Ron Jensen
    Aug 29, 2021 at 23:41
  • $\begingroup$ Agreed. Every time I try to learn it, the tutorial I'm watching (or reading) references some method that I don't know. When I go to learn that method, I can't find a tutorial that applies to the current (or same) version of blender, so I just quit. Maybe that should be a goal for future LTS releases - have a standardized API, and a comprehensive changelog for each new LTS release (which then updates the API standard for future releases). $\endgroup$ Aug 29, 2021 at 23:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can use bm.transform(mat) to transform all vertices. Will be far quicker than looping all vertices. Scale matrix from scale vector S = Matrix.Diagonal(scale).to_4x4() $\endgroup$
    – batFINGER
    Aug 30, 2021 at 12:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The API is pretty much consistent over the last few years @brockmann but if a silly developer like me has to spend literally days figuring out 'why oh why' the context (which btw has not changed) all of a sudden is incorrect, than sure you must question yourself, mmmmmh, might be we designed something not quite eeeuh user-friendly? 6 hours $\endgroup$
    – hewi
    Aug 30, 2021 at 21:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.