1
$\begingroup$

I'm writing asking for a little help. I used an image as a template plane underneath my 3D design. Things were going well but then I realized there was a strange phenomenon with measurements. The picture here is taken from the top. The view in Blender 2.8 is taken from the top. The measurement tool is overlaid on the image. The image happens to have a metric ruler in it.

Notice carefully that for shorter distances, the measurement tool is in error by a larger amount. The measurement tool is in error by a smaller amount for longer distances: For 40mm on the ruler, the measurement tool reads 34.96mm For 50mm on the ruler, the measurement tool reads 44.52mm For 100mm on the ruler, the measurement tool reads 92.3mm For 170mm on the ruler, the measurement tool reads 163.2mm For 280mm on the ruler, the measurement tool reads 290.2mm

The difference at 40mm is ~5mm (12% difference). The difference at 100mm is ~ 7.7 (7.7% difference). The difference at 170mm is ~7mm (4.1% difference). Amazingly, at 280mm, the difference is 0.8!

I used proportional scaling on the image. If I make it bigger or smaller, this strange result remains. If I measure it from the bottom of the ruler, the results are the same. This doesn't seem to be related to the Apply Scale when in Object mode problem. There is no modifier applied.

Bottomline: My 3d project is 280mm. That distance is correct but the smaller internal details are all wrong by varying amounts. I've tried to rescale one part but then another part is wrong. If someone could please help me, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, Dennis Image transform settings varying distance measurements full length

Varying distance measurements

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ camera lens distortion is a potential main cause as a 100% flat image is not possible using lenses. $\endgroup$ – dave44 Oct 7 '20 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Agree with Dave. For a better test scenario, you would have to un-distort the image accurately in the first place: blender.stackexchange.com/questions/15620/… $\endgroup$ – brockmann Oct 7 '20 at 19:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Using a photograph of a ruler is an excercise in futility. Besides the lens radial and tangential distortion, perspective will influence the measurements. If the sensor of the camera was not perfectly parallel to the ruler the distances will never be linear. $\endgroup$ – susu Oct 7 '20 at 20:15
3
$\begingroup$

The photo has barrel distortion, so the ruler scale isn't linear. Hence the inconsistencies.
Still, you can align it to the grid.

  1. Adjust transparency for the image, to see the grid underneath
  2. Move the 3D cursor to 0mm markings and set it as Pivot Point (using the overlay menu)
  3. Scale the image until the 170mm markings match the grid

(The gif starts with the ruler perfectly aligned) enter image description here

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much Jachym! That solved my problem. I truly appreciate you taking the time to make the video which explained it very clearly. Dennis $\endgroup$ – Proficient Oct 9 '20 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Glad to be of help :). Good luck with your project. $\endgroup$ – Jachym Michal Oct 9 '20 at 7:00
0
$\begingroup$

You can also scan the ruler on a flatbed scanner instead of a photo so the source image is flat without any lens or angle distortions.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.