3
$\begingroup$

Why did they skip 2.85, 2.86 and so on? Just curious.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Because they CAN! $\endgroup$
    – 10 Rep
    Aug 23 '20 at 2:45
6
$\begingroup$

Blender foundation wanted to move to a more familiar version numbering system.

Can't find a reliable source to quote at the moment, but I believe I remember reading somewhere that Ton Roosendal established that major Blender versions like 3.0 or 4.0 would have to carry deep API or paradigm changes to warrant a major version bump.

This meant that Blender would be stuck in the 2.0 series for a very long time, unless it was rewritten from the ground up.

After the 2.8 series revamp, newfound success and funding, a switch to a faster and more familiar numbering scheme was adopted, as stated in the Code Blog Post Blender LTS and 3.0

Release numbering Along with this, I also propose to accelerate a bit our release numbers this decade.

This summer we’ll do Blender 2.90 (new particle nodes), and in summer 2021 the Blender 3.0 series begins! By then we will implement a more conventional release numbering.

I suggest to do minor releases (3.0, 3.1, 3.2, … 3.7) for two-year periods, and then move to a new major release. Blender 4.0 could be there in 2023 already!

Below is a summary. Let us know in the comments below what you think

This way introduction of major features like the waited Particle Nodes warrants a major bump.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Also, now I want to make a cel shaded portrait of Ton Roosendaal due to the way you spelled his first name. xD $\endgroup$
    – BuzzKirill
    Aug 23 '20 at 7:12
  • $\begingroup$ Oops bad typo. Fix now, thanks $\endgroup$ Aug 23 '20 at 11:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.