6
$\begingroup$

I'm new to blender and I wonder what's the best way, with the least side effects, to add more detail to a model's face. It seems that the loop cut is the cleanest way of doing it but at the cost of adding unnecessary geometry. Subdivide seems like the obvious solution to a lot of problems but then you can't use a lot of features as it can create ngons. So when do you use it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I remember when I was a beginner and I had a lot of questions of finding a best balance to get things efficient. The subdivision surface modifier divides every polygon into 4 and smooth out the objects shape. I suggest looking up for beginner tutorials (you have a lot to learn there) and you will start to see how things are going. Check out "blendtuts.com", "blenderguru.com" and many others. $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Oct 17 '14 at 18:47
  • $\begingroup$ The modifier converts ngons and triangles to quads (4 sided polygons), but they are not so efficent to use on a curved surface when using the modifier. $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Oct 17 '14 at 18:51
  • $\begingroup$ Just to be clear I am not talking about the subsurf modifier but about the subdivide tool and the ngons it can produce on adjacent faces. Are you saying that its always bad and you might have to find a case with the least harm done? $\endgroup$ – user40079 Oct 17 '14 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ It depends on whether you really need the subdivision everywhere in the model, if you just want to create geometry for a window then knife cut would be the better choice. For sculpting you need more (dynamic) geometry. So the answer would be it depends. $\endgroup$ – stacker Oct 17 '14 at 19:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @someonewithpc this not an easy question as it might appear. I would currently subdivision only for use vertices for particle emission,duplication or landscapes. Sculpting requires retopo, loop-cuts only work well with decent meshes... $\endgroup$ – stacker Oct 17 '14 at 19:54
4
$\begingroup$

When modelling something you would always add minimal geometry (eg. loop cuts) and work with it until the shape of the object cannot be further improved with the current geometry! This is very important, as if you start adding too much geometry initially, you will get lost and you make your task exponentially harder, because you will have to manually manipulate so much more verts.

Now, in most cases you should avoid subdividing altogether, before you are finished modelling, in a sense. Meaning that with your modelling you would have laid out the optimal topology of the model and would have made sure that every vertex and every face is absolutely necessary for describing the object and maintaining the topology! Only then you would subdivide, to get a smoother result (as your object would be approximated at a higher resolution).

Having said that, don't consider the subdivision taboo and absolutely neglect it. Usually it is good practice to check the topology of your mesh, every once in a while, by subdividing it and seeing if it flows and looks natural... this way you can also spot duplicate vertices or holes in the mesh.

I am not a pro modeler and maybe someone could argue this is not always the case, however those are some tips that help me.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Subdivision is OK when you need the geometry some examples could be:

  • Landscapes enter image description here

  • Particle Systems (here used to emit buildings) enter image description here

In general loop-cuts should be the way to go, they allow later refinement because they follow the mesh's topology (most important in organic modelling).

In a subdivided mesh you would have to adjust each and every vertex, instead of selecting a loop as shown here:

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It depends, like architectural buildings and that kind of not so curving objects, no problem to use ngons and triangles, ngons help a lot when modeling those building. Flat shading is the key when rendering those objects. Example: left side object has flat shadind and 24 vertices, including ngons, right side has smooth shading and 156 vertices, no ngons. When rendering they looks identical. People use many times smooth shading and add unnecessary loopcuts to objects what does not need smooth shading, its a habbit. enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.