2
$\begingroup$

A while ago I following a tutorial which demonstrates how to position loop cuts in specific places using loop cut, Grab X-Y-Z and giving a specific numeric so the lop cut can relocate to the desired position.

I'm trying to use the same technique on this mesh, I have added one loop cut on one of the triangular faces. Which I then used the factor to designate the position. But when I try to use the technique as the instructor, instead of the loop cut moving, the whole face moves and deforms. In this case, should I just use the factor after doing a loop cut on each individual face, or am I complicating things trying to do what the video instructor is doing?

Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSR6bVFe5LM

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In the tutorial, the side 'rails' down which the edge is moving are parallel, so a translation (GY, for example) is equivalent to a slide (GG). On a triangle, that's not the case.

You can make a numerical entry for the distance of a translation, because all affected components move by the same amount. But you can't, by distance, for a slide, because vertices in a sliding loop will move different distances, depending on the location of adjacent vertices on the rails.

Instead, a numerical entry for a slide represents the fraction of the distance to adjacent vertices, where 0 is the current position, and distances to adjacent vertices are mapped to 1 and -1.

You might be able to use that fraction, with a bit of mental arithmetic, but usually, for accuracy, I find myself G translating single vertices down edges using Custom Orientations derived from them where necessary, and as far as possible thinking like a carpenter.. finding ways to transfer measurements from one part of a model to another.

|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh. I finally understand why loopcut position is relative and cannot be an absolute value :). Always learning. $\endgroup$ – Jachym Michal Jan 23 at 11:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Robbin. Thanks for your reply, in this instance I believe it's not too tedious to use the Fraction option, although it would be convenient if there was a way to achieve this using a method on the triangles. Thanks for your insight. $\endgroup$ – blender breath Jan 23 at 11:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.