I'm writing a python script that creates a large number of objects and I'd like them all to point at a certain point in 3d space.

(left is what I've got, right is what I want) enter image description here

Pretty much exactly like the 'Track-to' constraint, but I don't need it to update interactively or be animated, I just need to rotate each object when they are created. I also don't care about the up-direction at all, since the objects are cylindrically symmetrical.

I know how to create the objects, but I don't know how to aim them. I'm not good at maths, so I don't even know where to begin with this other than that it'll probably involve vectors and matrices (which I don't really understand).

The reason I don't want to use the existing constraint system is because it's a bit slow when dealing with a lot of objects, and I'd like to learn a bit about this sort of maths.


I can't explain the math to do it manually, but you can use python to create a constraint that will do the rotation for you. You can then apply the visual transform and delete the constraint if you don't want to leave it there.

targetobj = bpy.data.objects['Sphere']
pointyobj = bpy.data.objects['Cone']

ttc = pointyobj.constraints.new(type='TRACK_TO')
ttc.target = targetobj
ttc.track_axis = 'TRACK_Z'
# we don't care about the up_axis
# but default is Z and it needs to be different that track_axis
ttc.up_axis = 'UP_X'

pointyobj.select = True


Not sure if it will help but I believe the trackto_evaluate function currently on line 965 of constraint.c is the math behind the constraint.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ To make a camera point to a target using Python, I used the following values: ttc.track_axis = 'TRACK_NEGATIVE_Z'; ttc.up_axis = 'UP_Y'; $\endgroup$ – Justas Apr 24 '18 at 21:26

Join your objects. Control-J. See below.

For mathematical recreations you might see the link


Also consider free online books from your library if possible. Computer Graphics, 3D Computer Graphics.

For Immediate Results

(01) Create a suitable emitter mesh for placement of your objects. Duplicate your pointer object as archive .. Make mesh data single user. Use Particles on emitter mesh with your object with a suitable center ..Particles will not copy constraints. Set emission number to your taste. See Blender Particles online educational videos if necessary on a video internet site.

(02) [Convert] Particles to Real Objects under Modifier Tab. You will have many new objects selected for user convenience.

(03) Group the new objects

(04) Add Constraint Track To on a single object of group .. the active object. Select whole group keeping the Active Object and ......[Copy constraints to selected objects]. You will have many objects pointing to the same target. You may move target or group as whole to test.

If your computer has enough CPU Power I would stop at this step. You might want to list the specs of your computer. Many people use track to constraints ... they are dynamic and flexible and appreciated. A couple of [Track to] constraints are your friends.

(04.5) If you cones are placed already ... you can use them in the next step.

(05) If it suits your tastes [Join] the objects of the group. You will have one complex mesh composed of the original of the cones. Join is Control-J in object mode .. See Blender menus. You will have one [track to] constraint. You can remove the constraint and rotate the complex mesh into place on last time ..since the mesh will move when the constraint is deleted. Now there are now zero [track to] constraints.

particle emitter, cone, target, joined cones in green, and a duplicate

Consider dupligroups.

In the image above is an emitter mesh, red cube target, original gold cone with constraint, backup of cone, particle system, converted particles in green and a copy to show that it is now a single mesh

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the detailed answer, but as the title says I'm looking for a scripted python way, or at least an explanation of the math. $\endgroup$ – jbrick Sep 30 '14 at 8:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.