0
$\begingroup$

I wanted to do a something like skin pores. I tried to do it with brush alphas but the quality of it was very low or was different in different areas. And here is my question: what affects the quality of the results when using alphas on brushes when texture painting? I will put some images to show what I mean. (I apologize for my English) enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

I make some alpha in gimp. I cant remebere where i found this one from the begining (this "skin"). Brush texture 1k:

enter image description here enter image description here

Brush texture 4k:

enter image description here enter image description here

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe JPG is too lossy to be a good mask for a brush $\endgroup$
    – Serge L
    Mar 13, 2019 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ Do you get the same result when painting in the UV/Image Editor? What is the target texture canvas resolution versus the actual brush image resolution? $\endgroup$ Mar 13, 2019 at 23:26
  • $\begingroup$ When i used UV/Image Editor results was the same. Target texture is 1k. I was trying 1k and 4k brush texture resolution but nothing changed. I will update post with pictures of that. I am not sure if I answered your question correctly. $\endgroup$
    – user70476
    Mar 14, 2019 at 11:31

1 Answer 1

-1
$\begingroup$

I worked it out a quite some time ago, but maybe it will help someone else. I did bad UV mapping, begginer mistake.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .