When I compare the latest blender api to the 2.79b API (based on the current link from https://docs.blender.org/api/), I see that the bake_action API changed from accepting start_frame and end_frame to taking a single frames iterable.

When I run blender --version, I get:

Blender 2.79 (sub 6)
        build date: 2018-12-25
        build time: 20:34:04
        build commit date: 2018-12-22
        build commit time: 14:10
        build hash: 2c0c1f494dcf
        build platform: Linux
        build type: Release

However, when invoking bpy_extras.anim_utils.bake_action, I get:

  File "/usr/share/blender/2.79/scripts/addons/io_scene_godot/converters/animation/constraint_baking.py", line 87, in bake_constraint_to_action
TypeError: bake_action() missing 1 required keyword-only argument: 'frames'

This suggests that I have the 2.80 API, even though I seem to be on blender 2.79. What am I misunderstanding about blender versions?


Blender version 2.79b is the one that you can download when you click Download Blender at the top of the download page at https://www.blender.org/download/ at the time I am writing this (05-01-2019).

If you however choose to scroll down to the bottom of that page and click the red button 'Latest Experimental Builds' in the section with the red background and a clear disclaimer in English: enter image description here you will be downloading experimental builds (not unlike the disclaimer states) and may try latest changes that may include changes to the Python API.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure it's clear how this information relates to what the OP is seeing. IE. it doesn't explain why the user is seeing 2.79 when running --version. $\endgroup$ – Ray Mairlot Jan 5 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ I'll have a closer look and see if I am not mistaken, however, I believe Blender release is built on 22-03-2018. At least the Windows version that I get from the official download link. The date indicated in the question(build date: 2018-12-25) would have to mean that it is an experimantal build. Am I mistaken and Linux release version is updated? $\endgroup$ – Martin Z Jan 5 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see. I don't know about build dates. I think I just thought that if they had downloaded an experimental version that explicitly mentions 2.8 (as per that screenshot) they wouldn't have asked why they have 2.8 and that maybe they had built blender themselves. $\endgroup$ – Ray Mairlot Jan 5 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ I use experimental builds myself sometimes and I have noticed that the version information in them sometimes is weird - the numbers sometimes jump around, I think I saw 2.79.6 updated to 2.79.4 some time and then back again(don't remember exactly, it think it was like that), but I mean... They put a warning in red background there - what else could we expect. Experimantal means it is as it is and it can be whatever it is... $\endgroup$ – Martin Z Jan 5 at 16:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The way I understand it 2.79b indicates that it's the third release, just after 2.79 and 2.79a. Release would mean that it was built and made available for download from blender.org website. I would consider absolutely anything that is not one of the builds available at blender.org should not be called 2.79b. The documentation you are looking at is specified very specifically to be for that precise build: "Blender 2.79b f4dc9f9d68b - API documentation »". So first thing to do here would be to make sure you are using the correct build if you wanted it to mach the documentation. It should work. $\endgroup$ – Martin Z Jan 5 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.