I'm modeling a GoPro camera, and am using circular n-gons to make a set of nested depressions for the lens. The model without subsurf looks like this:n-gons in question are around the outer edge of the outer circle and in the center of the lens

(n-gons in question are around the outer edge of the outer circle and in the center of the len)

When I try to apply a subsurf modifier to any degree, I get crazy distortion like this: enter image description here

My only thought as to what could be causing this is that the mesh isn't all quads, so I tried using a remesh modifier, but only got high-enough quality results at around octree 9 or 10, far higher of a resolution than I want to deal with when render time comes along.

Is there any way short of manual retopo that I can stop the subsurf from freaking out over the n-gons?

Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time.

EDIT 1: I'm running Blender 2.8 Beta, so if all else fails I'm prepared to accept that this might just be a bug, in which case I'll start over in 2.79.

EDIT 2: So I fixed the problem through manual retopology, but I'm still interested in hearing if anybody knows a faster way to do this for future projects. Thanks!

  • $\begingroup$ Ty for the tick, but as batFINGER commented, my answer should have been more complete,, I've edited it.. $\endgroup$ – Robin Betts Dec 25 '18 at 15:37

A quick way to fix your topology:

enter image description here

  • Starting with the wrong number of vertices, having X > deleted faces only
  • Select the square's edges, and WSsubdivide with 7 cuts
  • Select both edge loops, and CtrlE > Bridge Edge Loops


.. but if you're subsurface modeling, as batFINGER points out, you really should be heading for a much lower number of vertices to make a circle in the end result:

4 sides .. Noticeably not octagonal under one level of subdiv., or circular under two. You can get away with it if you know it's never going to be close up. Shading artifacts, too.

5.. Can't remember the last time I used it...

6.. Quite a lot of things have 3-symmetry, and a hexagon makes a perfectly good circle

8.. By far the most common because of the shown topology - comes naturally out of a quad, the diagonals can be absorbed in 5-poles in a holding loop around the circle, or your beveled edges, so don't propagate around your model

.. any more than 8, probably large-scale structure rather than detail, or soaking up necessary loops from somewhere else in the model.

The Illustration is of 0,1,2 levels of subdivision on the various polygons, with a 32-circle in the middle for comparison.

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ If modelling for subd what resolution circle would you recommend? 4, 8, 16, 32 (as shown) ...? $\endgroup$ – batFINGER Dec 25 '18 at 3:33
  • $\begingroup$ @batFINGER Thanks, you're right.. This was only answering the 'is there a quick way?' part of the OP, not addressing the underlying problem.. Edited. $\endgroup$ – Robin Betts Dec 25 '18 at 15:28

Related Questions:

Tl;dr: NGons are split into triangles and will always cause uncontrolable geometry with the subdivision surface modifier. You can only stop this issue with retopology/proper topology.

  • If you're doing it manually there are certain addons which can assist in retopology, like RetopoFlow. You will always reach the best, but slowest, results manually.
  • A faster way would be to use a modifier, which adds geometry, like the Bevel modifier in your case.
  • Another option would be automatic retopology, but this is also not built-in to Blender. Tools like DynRemesh or Tesselator could be helpful.

The linked pages lead to paid addons, which I am not affiliated with. If linking to these is not ok, feel free to edit this answer.


When you have N-gons with too many edges you will ALWAYS run into problems like that when subdividing. I'd suggest reading this stuff to get more in-depth knowledge about sub-d modeling principles tips and tricks: http://wiki.polycount.com/wiki/Subdivision_Surface_Modeling.

Also, mesh doesn't have to have always be perfectly quad polys when you work with it. Your problem can also be solved by proper utilization of a knife tool in the area where you have those type of artifacts.


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.