Timeline for Using noise threshold of 0.1 produces a better result than 0.01
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2023 at 19:22 | comment | added | Duarte Farrajota Ramos♦ | You should edit your question and clarify that, otherwise I suspect people will have a hard time helping. We don't know what the scene is supposed to look like so we can't tell apart what is unwanted noise, what are denoise artifacts and what are actual scene details from those images. | |
| Feb 26, 2023 at 19:14 | comment | added | VALDE | @Duarte Farrajota Ramos The lower one is the one with 0.01. And yes I know that jpeg is poor choiec for evaluating noise. What I actually mean are those black spots that you can see for example at the brick in the background of the photo. Using noise as my choice of words was bad since I should have used the correct word from the beginning(english isnt my first language) There is denoising in both images. but the result looks almost the same without it | |
| Feb 26, 2023 at 18:55 | comment | added | Duarte Farrajota Ramos♦ | Which one is which? Which one do you consider "better"? JPEG compression is really poor choice for evaluating noise. Is there any denoising being applied? That would throw off any judgement we could potentially make. | |
| S Feb 26, 2023 at 18:49 | review | First questions | |||
| Feb 27, 2023 at 0:08 | |||||
| S Feb 26, 2023 at 18:49 | history | asked | VALDE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |